Modal Logic in Two Gestalts
نویسنده
چکیده
We develop a translation-based view dual of modal logic as the study of intensional languages that are at the same time interesting expressive and decidable parts of standard logical systems. This tandem approach improves our understanding of modal logic – while at the same time, it extends the range of modal notions and techniques into broader areas of standard logic. 1 Translation as a Way of Life 1.1 Basic modal logic and the modal fragment of FOL Modal languages as used to-day can be considered a species of their own, inhabiting the realm of Intensional Logic. But they can also be translated into fragments of standard logical languages, mostly first-order, sometimes higher-order or infinitary. These translations reflect the truth conditions for modal operators in possible worlds models. The ur-example is the basic modal language of possibility and necessity, whose standard translation ST inspired Correspondence Theory (van Benthem 1976, 1985): an existential modality <>p goes to a bounded quantifier ∃y (Rxy & Py) stating that the current world x has a successor y in which p holds
منابع مشابه
Suhrawardi's Modal Syllogisms
Suhrawardi’s logic of the Hikmat al-Ishraq is basically modal. So to understand his modal logic one first has to know the non-modal part upon which his modal logic is built. In my previous paper ‘Suhrawardi on Syllogisms’(3) I discussed the former in detail. The present paper is an exposition of his treatment of modal syllogisms. On the basis of some reasonable existential presuppositi...
متن کاملApproaches to Independence Friendly Modal Logic
The aim of the present paper is to discuss two different approaches for formulating independence friendly (IF) modal logic. In one of them, the language of basic modal logic is enriched with the slash notation familiar from IF first-order logics, and the resulting logic is interpreted in terms of games and uniform strategies. A different approach is formulated in the present paper: an IF modal ...
متن کاملUndecidability of first-order intuitionistic and modal logics with two variables
We prove that the two-variable fragment of first-order intuitionistic logic is undecidable, even without constants and equality. We also show that the twovariable fragment of a quantified modal logic L with expanding first-order domains is undecidable whenever there is a Kripke frame for L with a point having infinitely many successors (such are, in particular, the first-order extensions of pra...
متن کاملModels for Normal Intuitionistic Modal Logics
Kripke-style models with two accessibility relations, one intuitionistio and the other modal, are given for analogues of the modal system K based on Heyting's propositional logic. I t is shown that these two relations can combine with each other in various ways. Soundness and completeness are proved for systems with only the necessity operator, or only the possibility operator, or both. Embeddi...
متن کاملThree 13th-century views of quantified modal logic
There are two reasons why medieval logic is of interest to modern logician: One is to see how similar it is to modern logic and the other is to see how different it is. We study three 13th-century works on modal logic and give two examples their views of modal logic differ from modern views of the same: the nature of modality and the truth conditions for modal sentences. Because of the differen...
متن کامل